Kanai vs. Piya: A Difference in Character (Blog Post #3)

In the novel “The Hungry Tide” by Amitav Ghosh, we are introduced to the two main characters of the novel Kanai and Piya through not only the writer’s point of view, but also through each other’s perspectives. We initially meet Kanai, who goes about describing Piya through his eyes. Then we meet Piya, who describes Kanai through her eyes. Even though both characters share the “main character” spot in this novel, neither one of them are similar to the other at all– minus the fact that the two of them could be seen as “outsiders” in their respective environment. Between their personalities, how they interact with others, and how they carry themselves, the contrast between the two protagonists gives the reader the ability to read this novel through, legitimately, two completely different points of views– set with their own problems, their own interests, side characters, etc.

One way we can surely compare Kanai and Piya is through the fact that they could be seen as “outsiders”, or at least distant from their culture. We learn almost immediately about Kanai, as the text actually does call him an outsider, stating that, “Kanai was the one other “outsider” on the platform and he quickly attracted his own share of attention… as in the width of his stance, there was a quiet certainty, an indication of a well-grounded belief in his ability to prevail in most circumstances…” (Ghosh, 8) From this, we can already somewhat guess his circumstances to be described like this, also based on earlier parts of the novel such as when the chapter began. Kanai seems to be quite conceited, holding himself high above everyone else. It’s because of this mindset and his upbringing that sets him far, far apart from anyone else in India– he’s so distant from the real-life culture of his home that it’s like he was raised somewhere completely different. However, for our other protagonist, Piya, this is actually the case. Piya was not originally from India, she was born there but moved when she was too little to begin learning the language. It’s mentioned previously earlier in her opening part of the novel that she didn’t enjoy Chai in Seattle, but she confirms her identity when she has a run-in with Kanai on the train and accidentally spills her tea on his papers. She states, “‘About my being American? You’re very observant.’” (Ghosh, 13) We learn this tidbit of information, and then receive more about how she only speaks English and that she isn’t very good at it, that she isn’t very good at learning languages, and that she doesn’t find it too important as long as it doesn’t affect her work, which it doesn’t. (Ghosh, 13) Though one was born in India and the other was not, they are still both quite distant from the culture, no matter what their situations were beforehand.

To contrast Kanai and Piya is as simple as contrasting apples and oranges– mainly because they are two completely different characters with completely different personalities, appearances, and attributes that individually defines them as characters, especially main characters. We immediately start the novel with Kanai lost in his own self-absorption, giving himself the right to “appraise women” as if they were objects, already making him unlikeable right off the bat. “Kanai liked to think that he had the true connoisseur’s ability to both praise and appraise women…” (Ghosh, 7) When you appraise something, you determine it’s value– and that’s what Kanai does when he sees women according to this line, treating them as replaceable items that could either be worth something or worth nothing. Just only from that, and from even the fact that that was how he though of himself, he is definitely narcissistic. This is further evident in the fact that when he was on the train, out of all the other seats he could’ve picked, he actually went over to someone and asked them to move out of their seat so he could have it. “The newspaper reader goggled in astonishment and for a moment it seemed he might even protest or resist. But on taking in Kanai’s clothes and all the other details of his appearance, he underwent a change of mind…He gave in gracefully and made way for Kanai to sit beside the window.” (Ghosh, 9) Kanai happened to be dressed in a more western style, and according to the novel, people viewed those wearing western styled clothing to have some sort of connections with the law or be people of important status, which was what the newspaper gentleman thought when he looked at Kanai. Kanai can be viewed as a self-absorbed narcissist who abuses his status and appearance to have his way. Whereas Piya, on the other hand, is more kept to herself in that she is aloof and hardworking, and that she also prefers to avoid conflict. Even when Kanai asks about how she thinks she’s going to be able to communicate with others and get around, she plays it off well and is honest with him, “‘I’ll do what I usually do,’ she said with a laugh. ‘I’ll try to wing it. Anyway, in my line of work there’s not much talk needed.’” (Ghosh, 13) In terms of conflict avoidance, when she begins the process of being approved for a survey (I think..?) for work, it’s pointed out that she much prefers to do her work alone, and most likely hates the escorts/guards that are to go with her during the surveys. “Her face fell in dismay for she knew from previous experience that official escorts were always a hindrance…she would have far preferred to travel on her own…She dropped the matter without further demur.” But because she wanted to be able to start her survey as quickly as possibly, and not wanting to cause unnecessary problems, she sucked in her gut and decided to not say anything about the guard, showing us that she would much rather avoid problems.

The Hungry Tide and the Deconstruction of the Everyman and Audience Surrogate – Blog #4

The main characters of The Hungry Tide by Amitav Ghosh, Kanai and Piya, serve the purpose of being surrogates for readers who are not familiar with the real life setting of the book. They are both outsiders looking in just as the reader is and are fed information while also allowing the reader to see through their eyes and learn more about the area and its culture as they do. In writing this is known as an audience surrogate character,similar to the trope of “The Everyman”. As explained by TV tropes.com on their page about this character type 

“[The Everyman is] A character who is ordinary enough to be relatable to the average audience member. Everyman characters are often working or middle-class people with regular jobs and they deal with everyday problems, be it school, work, family or romance”

   Characters serving as the everyman are not always blank slates,however compared to the supporting cast they are often more grounded. Though these terms may seem interchangeable,they are very different upon closer analysis. The audience surrogate does not have to fit the personalities often attributed to the everyman,such as Kanai and Piya. They are introduced to aspects of the Sundarban culture by other characters,however, neither can be described as fitting the relatable everyman trope. While both are used to share information with the audience, personality-wise they are complete opposites. 

     Often the everyman character is painted as likable. From the first page, Kanai is decidedly not so. His first thought when seeing Piya is to judge her as if she was an object. When describing her androgynous appearance the text says he was not ‘deceived’. The usage of this word implies that it was his right to know her gender assigned at birth. He then proceeds to describe her,contrasting her appearance to his image of a native Indian woman.

“…his eyes settled on her slim, shapely figure. Her face was long and narrow, with an elegance of line markedly at odds with the severity of her haircut. There was no bindi on her forehead and her arms were free of bangles and bracelets, but on one of her ears was a silver stud, glinting brightly against the sun-deepened darkness of her skin” (Pg 11)

      Her deviances from this perceived image are described as being ‘at odds’ with her femininity and the places where she did conform to his perceived image it is seen as a sort of diamond in the rough. Perhaps it is my own bias as I am nonbinary and I,along with many of my trans siblings,have been put in similar situations as Piya regarding our appearance,but I didn’t take this passage as a simple description. As we are seeing the world through Kanai’s eyes,he comes off to me at least as extremely self-centered. This point is further proven when he gets on the train to Kolkata. His first action upon finding out he didn’t like the seat he had found,instead of simply looking for another,is to ask a man already sitting by the window to switch seats. The man only obliges because of the “otherness” of Kanai’s more western appearance which he associates with authority figures. Piya describes him as the sort of man who thinks that they were granted entitlement due to their class and education to a world where life’s challenges would always be swept away to make their life easier, exemplified after he knocks her hand and ends up with some of her spilled tea on him. 

“Do I really have a choice?” he said in a tone more challenging than ironic. “Does anyone have a choice when they’re dealing with Americans these days?”

    Piya is closer to the everyman character type,though she too diverges from complying fully to the trope. The everyman trope is rooted mostly in the assumption that the everyman is a cisgender heterosexual white middle-class man so that is partially a reason. After this interaction regarding the spilled tea, she feigns admiration at his observation to avoid an argument. She smiles to placate him and every second she spends trying to appeal to his self-centered attitude is described as forced,almost painful to keep up until he mentions how many languages he knows. The interactions she has up with him are all to satisfy him,taking the initiative to clean him up after he spilled her tea. On a slightly positive note,her job also keeps her from falling into the everyman trope. She is a cetologist,currently traveling to Canning to get a permit to do a survey of Sundarbans marine mammals. She is extremely passionate about her job,forgoing the usual survey process due to a team’s last-minute rejection letter in her field last year in order to have a better chance of getting the permit. It is made clear that this environment is new to her,and not many people would choose to be in her situation,much less without a guide. Even Kanai, self-centered as he is,upon finding out she doesn’t know the language remarks

“But tell me this,” he said. “If you don’t know any Bengali or Hindi, how are you planning to find your way around over there?” (Pg 16)

And Piya responds

“I’ll do what I usually do,” she said with a laugh. “I’ll try to wing it. Anyway, in my line of work there’s not much talk needed.” (Pg 16)

      As it is later shown once she is offered government aid via a bodyguard,at times she puts her work above her own personal feelings. She suspects at first that she is being scammed once he arrives unannounced but bites her tongue knowing questioning it may lead to her chances of surveying the dying population of marine mammals in the Sundarbans. This is a far cry from the everyman’s average nine-to-five office job and I find the personality given to her despite her role as the audience surrogate fascinating. I also appreciate this separation was given to Kanai,I just personally dislike him as a person.

midterm plans (includes fix for earlier issue prior to 3pm Sunday)

Here are the instructions for the midterm, including all links, etc.

As promised, here is the link to the Word template you’ll use for your midterm. It’s probably a good idea to download it (button on upper left-hand corner) and edit it on your machine (you can use Pages or whatever instead of Word if you like)

  • your exam will be based on the Clausen article under etexts
  • the short answer questions are in hypothes.is and on the template (be sure to log in and select our ENGL252Sp23 group). You must enter all responses on your template; the questions are just on hypothes.is to provide some context. Do not enter anything test-related in hypothes.is
  • All instructions and links are on the template. Due Tuesday 10/10 at midnight: one letter grade deduction for exams received by Wednesday at midnight, and a zero for exams received thereafter. Upload to Dropbox via this link when finished.

Good luck and see you Thursday!

 

midterm on the horizon

We’ll talk about it in class today, but I wanted to alert you to the midterm that’s coming a week from Tuesday. A couple of notes:

  • It’s a take-home midterm that’s open-book and open-note.
  • You will be asked to evaluate a third “journal article” on Butler’s novel, one you’ve never seen before, providing answers to a few short-answer questions and one longer essay. I estimate the exam should take 1.5-2 hours to complete, but I will give you a couple of days. I will release it via email on Sunday night and you will upload it via a Dropbox link by Tuesday at midnight (remember, “Tuesday is a Monday” due to Indigenous People’s Day on Monday 10/9). We will not meet for class on Tuesday: use that time to work on the exam!
  • The exam will test your ability to quickly evaluate aspects of journal-length academic arguments, the skills we’re starting to work on today with Canavan. I realize these are very much new, developing skills, so I don’t expect perfection. The best way to study is to read Canavan and Frazier (Thursday’s reading), annotate freely, and engage as usual in our classroom discussion.
  • I will provide the MS Word template and the Dropbox link on Sunday via the blog and the “group” email list. Be sure to check your email on Sunday to make sure you get it, and make sure to leave adequate time in your schedule to work on the exam.
  • Exams received after midnight Tuesday will receive one letter grade deduction; after Wednesday at midnight, a zero.

NYT piece on population degrowth

In ways that mesh with our readings of Haraway and Butler, the NYT today has a piece with some gorgeous “data visualizations” that show the likely precipitous decline of world population, after a predicted peak later this century:

 

Opinion | All of the Predictions Agree on One Thing: Humanity Peaks Soon

Most people now live in countries where two or fewer children are born for every two adults.

 

Also, a quick PSA: as Hunter students, you all have free digital access to the New York Times. You heard it here first: reading the NYT regularly is basic “equipment for living” for an educated citizenry and we all have free digital access from the Library (works for computers, iOS, and Android devices). So go get it and read, as the Times puts it, “all the news that’s fit to print” on your phone while you commute!