The Intersection of Environmental Concerns, Realism and Infrastructure
Ben Lerner’s 10:04 novel is not just about melodrama. There are so many things that add such vivid imagery to the novel like the major catastrophes that happened with the two storms, the narrator’s heart condition, or even the sperm donation situation to help his friend’s insemination. The novel “is not a book of poems, though it is filled with poetry. It is not nonfiction, though biographical details overlap tantalizingly with Lerner’s actual life. There is no clear plot, though there are numerous intersecting plotlines” (a review by Shan Wang, a Harvard committee). Going back to the major catastrophes that happened throughout the novel, the novel explores the sides of realism in the face of climate change. Ben De Bruyn’s article, “Realism 4°. Objects, weather, and infrastructure in Ben Lerner’s 10:04,” discusses environmental concerns, realism, and infrastructure in Lerner’s novel and how this intersection tackles the issue of climate change and its effects on daily life, highlighting the significance of a broader cultural memory that encompasses capitalism, weather, and energy.
In Lerner’s novel, the theme of climate change and its impact on everyday life is explored through the protagonist’s personal experiences and broader environmental concerns. The novel delves into the environmental trauma of climate change, focusing on the portrayal of hurricanes Irene and Sandy in New York in 2011 and 2012 though they are not named directly in the novel. The story’s narrative is expanded to include timeframes from paleontology and astronomy, which disrupts the protagonist’s understanding of space and time on a cosmic and geological scale. The novel also serves as a powerful medium for memorializing specific traumas from the communal past, such as the 9/11 attacks and reflecting on the anticipated trauma of climate change.
Additionally, the novel presents infrastructure in a mixed way, showing both its idealistic and dystopian aspects. For example, the novel highlights the positive aspects of infrastructure, especially public structures like the Brooklyn Bridge, portraying it as a beautiful and idealistic symbol. However, it also implies that infrastructure can act as a form of “material entrapment” (De Bruyn), imposing specific ways of life and contributing to environmental issues. Lerner suggests that to address climate change, it is important for readers to reconsider the way infrastructure is designed.
So how do environmental concerns, realism, and infrastructure intersect? De Bruyn emphasizes the growing significance of cultural memory about capitalism, weather, and energy underscoring how modified versions of realism play a crucial role in how culture responds to climate change, particularly using Lerner’s novel as an example. His analysis looks at how the novel depicts bad weather, memory issues, and how society’s structures affect the movement of things and people. It emphasizes how these depictions showcase the building of communities and the use of resources in our modern era heavily reliant on petroleum. De Bruyn also looks at how climate change affects human memory and the way things like objects, weather, and infrastructure are described in novels. It provides a more detailed understanding of how literature responds to climate change by considering both the environment and realistic aspects. He discusses the issues related to infrastructure, emphasizing its physical hazards and its connection to significant environmental problems. One example, as he explains, is the relationship between cars and oil, which contributes to slow violence. Additionally, the novel also touches upon extinct transportation methods.
In conclusion, Ben Lerner’s novel 10:04 intricately weaves together environmental concerns, realism, and infrastructure to create a challenging and provocative narrative that delves into the impact of climate change on daily life. Through the exploration of major catastrophes, the novel portrays the environmental trauma of climate change and reflects on the broader cultural memory encompassing capitalism, weather, and energy. Additionally, the novel presents infrastructure in a mixed light, highlighting both its positive and dystopian aspects, and emphasizing the need to reconsider the design of infrastructure in addressing climate change. De Bruyn’s analysis underscores the growing significance of cultural memory and the role of modified versions of realism in shaping cultural responses to climate change. Overall, the novel serves as a powerful medium for examining the intersection of these themes and provides a nuanced understanding of how literature responds to environmental challenges in the modern era.

