BLOG POST #6
Lerner’s 10:04 has an interesting theme of time and space as something that can be manipulated. Through his character, we observe what appears to be rants and obsessive overthinking. These scenes reveal a sort of time slipping in his consciousness as he drifts in and out of the present and projects into the future. There is a pattern of overthinking simple decisions or actions due to the paralyzing fear of the choice having a greater impact. In exercising free will, those choices made inform the layout for how the rest of life is going to turn out. Lerner applies this logic to every trivial decision such as picking a method of sedation, anesthesia or an IV. He questions “I can’t figure out if abolishing the memory of pain is the same thing as abolishing the pain” (63). This overthinking unfortunately triggers an indecisiveness in him that leaves him to procrastinate until the very last moment. He illustrates pareidolia, which we learn is where a perception of meaning is developed in places where there is none. This means that where the audience is recognizing a mundane choice, the narrator sees a more drastic consequence. He says that by getting rid of the pain, the repercussion will be the possibility of the separation version of himself into two different versions. That would be the version of him who does not remember and lives in the present and another version of himself that carries the memory of the experience his dental procedure and aftermath that exists outside of time (64). His worry is that using anesthesia would equate to abandoning this fictional other self. Lerner’s thought process is curious as he leaps from pondering over guilt of not remembering and then exclaims that by actually remembering, he has a false truth. Following his procedure, he remarks, “I do remember the drive, the view, stroking Liza’s hair, the incommunicable beauty destined to disappear. I remember it, which means it never happened” (81). He appears to be wondering if he is in charge of his own story and to what extent does his free will impact the larger picture of his life. The sentiment is in exercising your free will, those choices inform the layout for how your life is going to turn out. Lerner rethinks his identity continuously and as he searches through his memories, trying to assess what it real and what is not. Outside of the narrator’s character, other chatacter have the same surrounding theme of space and time. Noor tells the narrator about her origin story, being adopted and raised by her dad and questioning her right to his heritage. Noor said “…it was my whole life up until that point that had happened but never occurred” (107). In this example, Noor is separated into two versions of herself. One is the version of herself who did not ever learn that she was adopted by her father and the other is the ignorant version of her. Somewhere on another timeline or different location in time and space, is the version of her who never discovers she is adopted. But in her present reality, her mother reveals that the truth she has always known was a fallacy. What is the purpose of this comparison to the narrator and Noor’s experience with separation of self by means of time and space? Well, Lerner does a great job of imploring readers to question if we are in charge of our own story and to what degree do we have free will. Do your choices inform your sense of self? Or are there predisposing factors that shape us?

